Emdr Side Effects

EMDR_side_effect EMDR Side Effects – As with anything and everything in life, there is always a side effect, but in the case of this particular psychotherapy, there is not much to talk about.

According to EMDR Institute, EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) is a psychotherapy that enables people to heal from the symptoms and emotional distress that are the result of disturbing life experiences. 

Repeated studies show that by using EMDR therapy people can experience the benefits of psychotherapy that once took years to make a difference.  It is widely assumed that severe emotional pain requires a long time to heal. 

EMDR therapy shows that the mind can in fact heal from psychological trauma much as the body recovers from physical trauma.  When you cut your hand, your body works to close the wound.  If a foreign object or repeated injury irritates the wound, it festers and causes pain.  Once the block is removed, healing resumes. 

EMDR therapy demonstrates that a similar sequence of events occurs with mental processes.  The brain’s information processing system naturally moves toward mental health.  If the system is blocked or imbalanced by the impact of a disturbing event, the emotional wound festers and can cause intense suffering. 

Once the block is removed, healing resumes.  Using the detailed protocols and procedures learned in EMDR training sessions, clinicians help clients activate their natural healing processes.

In summary

  1. It has been noted that patients that underwent the treatment had distressing and unresolved memories which may emerge occasionally.  This is a normal and
    natural part of the treatment process. Rather than calling it a “side effect,” this could be
    considered a part of the main effect, leading to desensitizing and reprocessing of the root cause of the memories.

  2. Some unexpected results may occur during or after therapy that was not part of the plan, reactions like having a high level of sensitivity or emotions or some physical sensations.  By this time in the treatment process, much work was done to prepare you for this possibility. Plus, your therapist will help you handle whatever comes up during the session.
  3. Subsequent to the treatment session, the processing of incidents/material may continue, and other dreams, memories feelings, etc., may emerge.  If this should become too much for you to handle on your own, you are welcome to call your therapist, who will help you.

After speaking with one of the EMDR therapists at work, I was told that the stages involve taking the patient to his/her happy place before embarking on the treatment.  It’s also been noted that some patients could not be treated with this reprocessing technique, which so far has a low percentage rate.  That would not surprise me as I know every form of medication in life has its pros and cons, which in turn has side effects.  The journey to resolve PTSD and/or abusive memory is just beginning and I can’t wait to see how well it will develop.

Learn More by Visiting:

References about EMDR Therapy and Side Effects

1. van der Kolk BA, Spinazzola J, Blaustein ME, et al. A randomized clinical trial of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), fluoxetine, and pill placebo in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: treatment effects and long-term maintenance. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;68(1):37–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v68n0105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]27. Shapiro F. EMDR therapy training manual. Watsonville, CA: EMDR Institute; 2012. [Google Scholar]

2. Davidson PR, Parker KC. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):305–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Barrowcliff AL, Gray NS, Freeman TCA, MacCulloch MJ. Eye-movements reduce the vividness, emotional valence and electrodermal arousal associated with negative autobiographical memories. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15(2):325–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789940410001673042. [Google Scholar]

4. Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA, Dek EC, et al. Reducing vividness and emotional intensity of recurrent “flashforwards” by taxing working memory: an analogue study. J Anxiety Disord. 2011 May;25(4):599–603. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Kuiken D, Bears M, Miall D, Smith L. Eye movement desensitization reprocessing facilitates attentional orienting. Imagin Cogn Pers. 2001;21(1):3–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/L8JX-PGLC-B72R-KD7X. [Google Scholar]

6. Christman SD, Garvey KJ, Propper RE, Phaneuf KA. Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):221–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Parker A, Buckley S, Dagnall N. Reduced misinformation effects following saccadic bilateral eye movements. Brain Cogn. 2009 Feb;69(1):89–97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Lee CW, Cuijpers P. A meta-analysis of the contribution of eye movements in processing emotional memories. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;44(2):231–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.11.001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA, Janssen WC, van der Beek J. Eye movements reduce vividness and emotionality of “flashforwards.” Behav Res Ther. 2010 May;48(5):442–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.01.003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Kuiken D, Chudleigh M, Racher D. Bilateral eye movements, attentional flexibility and metaphor comprehension: the substrate of REM dreaming? Dreaming. 2010;20(4):227–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020841. [Google Scholar]

11. Schubert SJ, Lee CW, Drummond PD. The efficacy and psychophysiological correlates of dual-attention tasks in eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Jan;25(1):1–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.06.024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Stickgold R. Sleep-dependent memory processing and EMDR action. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research. 2008;2(4):289–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.2.4.289. [Google Scholar]

12. Solomon R, Shapiro F. EMDR and adaptive information processing: the development of resilience and coherence. In: Gow K, Celinski MJ, editors. Individual trauma: recovering from deep wounds and exploring the potential for renewal. 1st ed. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2012. Aug 15, [Google Scholar]

13. Mol SS, Arntz A, Metsemakers JF, Dinant GJ, Vilters-van Montfort PA, Knottnerus JA. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after non-traumatic events: evidence from an open population study. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;186(6):494–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.6.494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]